CrimeLine
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Login/Out
    • LOGIN
    • LOGOUT
    • Change Password (when logged in)
  • MAIN MENU
  • NEWS CENTRE
    • New Cases & Developments Main Feed
    • Daily Crime News
    • Regulatory Law Updater
    • New Legislation
    • Extradition Cases
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • GDPR
  • Jobs
  • CrimeLine Assist
    • My Tickets
    • Submit Ticket
  • Legislation Service
  • CPD
    • CPD Content
    • View My CPD Record
  • Procedure Rules
  • Bookmarks
  • Quick Links (Statutes)
    • Sentencing Act 2020
    • PACE 1984
    • MCA 1980
    • Crime and Disorder Act 1998

Kendrick, SCCO 259/10

  • Kendrick, SCCO 259/10

    Please log in to view content

  • Roberts, SCCO 112/14

    Please log in to view content

  • Khan, SCCO 316/13

    Please log in to view content

  • Munir, SCCO 264/14

    Please log in to view content

  • Banfield [2014] EWCA Crim 1824

      • Latest
    Please log in to view content

  • LCCSA and CLSA v Lord Chancellor [2014] EWHC 3020 (Admin)

    Please log in to view content

  • Napper, SCCO 160/14

    Transcript The true meaning of the funding order so far as it concerns evidence served digitally is explained in paragraph 29 onwards of the Judgment. The Costs Judge rejected the MOJ’s argument that the amendment was to be narrowly construed. In para 40 and 41 the issue of duplication of…

  • Greenwood [2010] 2 Costs LR 268

    Please log in to view content

  • French and Others [2014] 4 Costs LR 786

    Please log in to view content

  • Geeling and Others, SCCO 40/14

    Please log in to view content

  • Gillett, SCCO 185/14

    Please log in to view content

  • Nicholson, SCCO 197/14

    Please log in to view content

  • Fiaz, SCCO Ref: 57/14

    Please log in to view content

  • Guy, SCCO Ref: 96/14

    Please log in to view content

  • Crawley and Others, ‘Operation Cotton’, Southwark Crown Court 1 May 2014

    Transcript Update: Case reversed on appeal (R v Crawley and others) Proceedings stayed as abuse of process due to no counsel being prepared to represent the defendant’s at the VHCC rates being offered by government.

  • Valton, SCCO 32/14

    Please log in to view content

  • Jalibaghodelehzi, SCCO Ref: 354/13; [2014] 4 Costs L.R. 781

    Please log in to view content

  • Wortley, SCCO 06/14

    Please log in to view content

  • Lee, SCCO Ref: 343/13

    Please log in to view content

  • Osoteko [2014] 1 Costs LR 190

    Please log in to view content

  • Flannigan, SCCO Ref: 215/13, 268/13 & 317/13

    Please log in to view content

  • PKA and PJA, Leeds Crown Court 26 February 2014

    Please log in to view content

  • Sturdy [1999] 1 Costs LR 1

    Please log in to view content

  • Nettleton and Others, SCCO 58/13

      • Latest
    Please log in to view content

  • Slessor [1984] Costs LR (Core) 438

      • Latest
    Please log in to view content

  • Highbury Corner Magistrates’ Court, ex parte Punatar [2002] EWHC 1196 (Admin)

    Please log in to view content

  • McCreadie, SCCO Ref: 350/12

    Please log in to view content

  • Raymond Brownlee for Judicial Review (AP) (Northern Ireland)

    Please log in to view content

  • Garness, SCCO Ref: 132/13

    Please log in to view content

  • P [2008] EW Misc 2 (EWCC)

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Renata Andrews and Others, Blackfriars Crown Court 19 November 2013

      • Latest
    Please log in to view content

  • Davis and Thabangu [2013] EWCA Crim 2424

    Please log in to view content

  • Lord Chancellor v Ahmed [2013] EWHC 3642 (QB)

    Please log in to view content

  • Nutting [2013] 6 Costs L.R. 1037

      • Latest
    Please log in to view content

  • R (SP) v Lord Chancellor [2013] EWHC 4011 (Admin)

    Please log in to view content

  • Tuckers Solicitors v Lord Chancellor [2013] EWHC 3817 (QB)

    Please log in to view content

  • Chowdhury [2009] 3 Costs LR 514

    Please log in to view content

  • Hussain, SCCO Ref: 217/13

    Please log in to view content

  • Aldridge, SCCO 221/13

    Please log in to view content

  • Gordon Smith, SCCO 146/13

    Please log in to view content

  • Dunne, SCCO Ref: 201/13

    1. Miss Louise Santamera of Counsel appeals against the decision made by the Determining Officer at the Legal Aid Agency to reduce her claim for special preparation from 644 hours to 190 hours. Criminal Defence Service (Funding) Order 2007 – Schedule 1 14. Fees for Special Preparation (1) This paragraph…

  • Hill and Dalton [2007] 5 Costs LR 788

    Please log in to view content

  • King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Council v (1) Bunning and (2) Legal Aid Agency [2013] EWHC 3390 (QB)

    Please log in to view content

  • Alwan [2000] 2 Costs LR 326

    Please log in to view content

  • Mansell [2011] 3 Costs LR 531

    Please log in to view content

  • Noon [2013] 4 Costs LR 633

    Please log in to view content

  • Akinrele [2013] 4 Costs LR 637

    Please log in to view content

  • Azam and Others [2006] EWCA Crim 161

    Please log in to view content

  • Lord Chancellor v Purnell and McCarthy [2010] 1 Costs LR 81

    Please log in to view content

  • Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs v Stork [2005] EWHC 1763 (QB)

    Please log in to view content

Prev Next
(c) CrimeLine. Terms and Conditions of Website Use Accessibility Statement