CrimeLine
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • MAIN MENU
  • News Centre
  • Login/Out
    • LOGIN
    • LOGOUT
    • Change Password (when logged in)
    • MFA settings
  • Catch Up Email Service
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • GDPR
  • Jobs
  • CrimeLine Assist
    • My Tickets
    • Submit Ticket
  • CPD
    • CPD Content
    • My CPD record
  • Procedure Rules
  • Bookmarks
  • Legislation
    • Legislation Search
    • MCA 1980
    • PACE 1984
    • Crime and Disorder Act 1998
    • Criminal Justice Act 2003
    • Sentencing Act 2020
    • Crime and Policing Act 2026
    • Sentencing Act 2026
  • Sentencing Guidelines
    • Sentencing Guidelines
    • Historic Sentencing —Under 18 at Date of Offence
    • SA 2026 Release Calculator
  • CrimeLine AI & Tools
    • CrimeLine AI Tools
    • PDF Suite
    • Redaction
    • Sanctions Screening
    • SA 2026 Release Calculator
    • Historic Sentencing Availability — Offenders Aged Under 18 at Date of Offence
    • Precedent Library (under construction)
    • Duty Solicitor Compliance Record
    • Task Manager
    • Practice Manager Dashboard

Smith [2013] 3 Costs LR 516

  • Smith [2013] 3 Costs LR 516

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Muoka [2013] 3 Costs LR 523

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • R (Dawes) v Nottingham Crown Court, 19/01/2005 Times Law Reports

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Murria v Lord Chancellor [2000] 1 Costs LR 81

      • Latest
    Please log in to view content

  • Ajufo [2013] 2 Costs LR 369

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Taylor [2013] 2 Costs LR 374

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Christie and Others [2010] 4 Costs LR 634

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Ayres, 29 April 2002

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Riddell, Unreported, July 1998

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Purvis v Legal Services Commission [2013] EWHC 613 (Admin)

      • Latest
    Please log in to view content

  • Otote, SCCO Ref: 08/11

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • H-B [2013] 1 Costs LR 181

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Nettleton [2013] 1 Costs LR 186

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Howitt, SCCO 386/12, 13 February 2013

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Lord Chancellor v Woodhall [2013] EWHC 764 (QB)

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Holden [2010] 5 Costs LR 851

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Sandiford, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs [2013] EWHC 168 (Admin)

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • P [2011] EWCA Crim 1130

      • Latest
    Please log in to view content

  • Z and Others, Leeds Crown Court, 9 October 2008

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • R (Crown Prosecution Service) v Bolton Crown Court, Bar Council of England and Wales Intervening [2012] EWHC 3570 (Admin)

      • Latest
    Please log in to view content

  • Richards and 13 Others [2012] 5 Costs LR 998

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Dumbaya [2012] 5 Costs LR 976

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Scunthorpe Justices ex parte S, Case No: CO/3122/97

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • R (Watson) v HM Courts and Tribunals Service National Taxing Team [2012] EWHC 2865 (Admin)

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Chubb, Supreme Court Costs Office, 14 May 2002

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Dawson, Supreme Court Taxing Office, 23 November 1998

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Metcalf [2010] 4 Costs LR 646

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Ashgar Khan, Birmingham Crown Court 10 July 2001

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Forrester [2012] 4 Costs LR 811

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Liverpool City Justices, ex parte McGhee [1993] Crim LR 609

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Havering Juvenile Court, ex parte Buckley, Unreported, 12 July 1983

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Griffiths [2011] EWHC 90204 (Costs)

      • Latest
    Please log in to view content

  • Sturmer [2009] EWHC 90157 (Costs)

      • Latest
    Please log in to view content

  • Brandon [2011] EWHC 90205 (Costs)

      • Latest
    Please log in to view content

  • Stopyra v District Court of Lublin, Poland [2012] EWHC 1787 (Admin)

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Debenham SCCO 10/12, 16 May 2012

      • Latest
    Please log in to view content

  • Cato, SCCO, 9 March 2012

      • Latest
    Please log in to view content

  • Clive Rees Associates Solicitors v Swansea Magistrates’ Court [2011] EWHC 3155 (Admin)

      • Latest
    Please log in to view content

  • Murphy v Media Protection Services Limited [2012] EWHC 529 (Admin)

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Highbury Corner Magistrates’ Court, ex parte Sonn and Co (a firm), Divisional Court 17 May 1995

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Law Society v The Lord Chancellor [2012] EWHC 794 (Admin)

      • Blog
    Please log in to view content

  • Vyse [2011] EWCA Crim 3255

      • Latest
    Please log in to view content

Prev
(c) CrimeLine. Terms and Conditions of Website Use Accessibility Statement
Accessibility Adjustments

Accessibility Commitment for CrimeLine Training Limited

At CrimeLine Training Limited, we are committed to making our digital presence as accessible and inclusive as reasonably possible for all users, including individuals with disabilities. Our goal is to improve the usability of https://www.crimeline.co.uk and to support a more accessible experience for everyone, regardless of their abilities or the technologies they use.

Our Approach to Accessibility

We aim to align with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), which define internationally recognized standards for digital accessibility. While full compliance cannot always be guaranteed, we strive to implement improvements where feasible and regularly review accessibility-related aspects of our website. Accessibility is an ongoing process, and we are committed to improving the experience over time as technologies, standards, and user needs evolve.

Accessibility Features

To support accessibility, https://www.crimeline.co.uk may utilize tools such as the OneTap accessibility toolbar. This interface provides users with a range of helpful features, including:
  • Adjustable text size and contrast settings
  • Highlighting of links and text for better visibility
  • Full keyboard navigation of the toolbar interface
  • Quick launch via keyboard shortcut: Alt + . (Windows) or ⌘ + . (Mac)
Please note the following:
  • The availability and effectiveness of these features depend on the website's configuration and ongoing maintenance.
  • While we strive to ensure accessibility, we cannot guarantee that every part of https://www.crimeline.co.uk will be fully accessible at all times. Some content may be provided by third parties or affected by technical constraints beyond our immediate control.

Feedback and Contact

We welcome your feedback. If you experience any accessibility barriers or have suggestions for improvement, please contact us: Email: [email protected] We are committed to reviewing all inquiries and aim to respond within 3–5 business days. If you require assistance accessing any part of this website, we are happy to provide support through alternative channels upon request. Last updated: October 14, 2026
How long do you want to hide the toolbar?
Hide Toolbar Duration
Select your accessibility profile
Vision Impaired Mode
Enhances website's visuals
Seizure Safe Profile
Clear flashes & reduces color
ADHD Friendly Mode
Focused browsing, distraction-free
Blindness Mode
Reduces distractions, improves focus
Epilepsy Safe Mode
Dims colors and stops blinking
Content Modules
Font Size

Default

Line Height

Default

Color Modules
Orientation Modules