Napper, SCCO 160/14
The true meaning of the funding order so far as it concerns evidence served digitally is explained in paragraph 29 onwards of the Judgment. The Costs Judge rejected the MOJ’s argument that the amendment was to be narrowly construed. In para 40 and 41 the issue of duplication of work is discussed – the approach in this case may lead to future friction between litigator’s and advocates as to who does what.