Contents of this Part

General rules
When this Part applies	rule 14.1
Exercise of court’s powers: general	rule 14.2
Duty of justices’ legal adviser	rule 14.3
General duties of court officer	rule 14.4

Bail
Prosecutor’s representations about bail	rule 14.5
Reconsideration of police bail by magistrates’ court	rule 14.6
Notice of application to consider bail	rule 14.7
Defendant’s application or appeal to the Crown Court
after magistrates’ court bail decision	rule 14.8
Prosecutor’s appeal against grant of bail	rule 14.9
Consideration of bail in a murder case	rule 14.10
Condition of residence	rule 14.11
Electronic monitoring requirements	rule 14.12
Accommodation or support requirements	rule 14.13
Requirement for surety or payment, etc.	rule 14.14
Forfeiture of a recognizance given by a surety	rule 14.15
Bail condition to be enforced in another European Union member State	rule 14.16
Enforcement of measure imposed in another European Union member State	rule 14.17

Custody time limits
Application to extend a custody time limit	rule 14.18
Appeal against custody time limit decision	rule 14.19

Extension of bail before charge
Exercise of court’s powers: extension of pre-charge bail	rule 14.20
Application to authorise extension of pre-charge bail	rule 14.21
Application to withhold information from the defendant	rule 14.22

GENERAL RULES

When this Part applies14.1.

(1)

This Part applies where—

(a)

a magistrates’ court or the Crown Court can—

(i)

grant or withhold bail, or impose or vary a condition of bail, and

(ii)

where bail has been withheld, extend a custody time limit; and

(b)

a magistrates’ court can monitor and enforce compliance with a supervision measure imposed in another European Union member State.

(2)

Rules 14.20, 14.21 and 14.22 apply where a magistrates’ court can authorise an extension of the period for which a defendant is released on bail before being charged with an offence.

(3)

In this Part, ‘defendant’ includes a person who has been granted bail by a police officer.

[Note. See in particular—

(a)

the Bail Act 1976305;

(b)

section 128 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980306 (general powers of magistrates’ courts in relation to bail);

(c)

section 81 of the Senior Courts Act 1981307 (general powers of the Crown Court in relation to bail);

(d)

section 115 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009308 (exclusive power of the Crown Court to grant bail to a defendant charged with murder);

(e)

Part 7 of the Criminal Justice and Data Protection (Protocol No. 36) Regulations 2014309, which gives effect to Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA of 23^rd October, 2009, on the application, between member States of the European Union, of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention (bail conditions pending trial);

(f)

section 22 of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985310 (provision for custody time limits);

(g)

the Prosecution of Offences (Custody Time Limits) Regulations 1987311 (maximum periods during which a defendant may be kept in custody pending trial); and

(h)

sections 47ZF and 47ZG of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984312 (extensions by court of pre-charge bail time limit).

At the end of this Part there is—

(a)

a summary of the general entitlement to bail, and of the exceptions to that entitlement; and

(b)

a list of the types of supervision measure to which Part 7 of the Criminal Justice and Data Protection (Protocol No. 36) Regulations 2014 applies, and a list of the grounds for refusing to monitor and enforce such a measure.]

Exercise of court’s powers: general14.2.

(1)

The court must not make a decision to which this Part applies unless—

(a)

each party to the decision and any surety directly affected by the decision—

(i)

is present, in person or by live link, or

(ii)

has had an opportunity to make representations;

(b)

on an application for bail by a defendant who is absent and in custody, the court is satisfied that the defendant—

(i)

has waived the right to attend, or

(ii)

was present when a court withheld bail in the case on a previous occasion and has been in custody continuously since then;

(c)

on a prosecutor’s appeal against a grant of bail, application to extend a custody time limit or appeal against a refusal to extend such a time limit—

(i)

the court is satisfied that a defendant who is absent has waived the right to attend, or

(ii)

the court is satisfied that it would be just to proceed even though the defendant is absent; and

(d)

the court is satisfied that sufficient time has been allowed—

(i)

for the defendant to consider the information provided by the prosecutor under rule 14.5(2), and

(ii)

for the court to consider the parties’ representations and make the decision required.

(2)

The court may make a decision to which this Part applies at a hearing, in public or in private.

(3)

The court may determine without a hearing an application to vary a condition of bail if—

(a)

the parties to the application have agreed the terms of the variation proposed; or

(b)

on an application by a defendant, the court determines the application no sooner than the fifth business day after the application was served.

(4)

The court may adjourn a determination to which this Part applies, if that is necessary to obtain information sufficient to allow the court to make the decision required.

(5)

At any hearing at which the court makes one of the following decisions, the court must announce in terms the defendant can understand (with help, if necessary), and by reference to the circumstances of the defendant and the case, its reasons for—

(a)

withholding bail, or imposing or varying a bail condition;

(b)

granting bail, where the prosecutor opposed the grant; or

(c)

where the defendant is under 18—

(i)

imposing or varying a bail condition when ordering the defendant to be detained in local authority accommodation, or

(ii)

ordering the defendant to be detained in youth detention accommodation.

(6)

At any hearing at which the court grants bail, the court must—

(a)

tell the defendant where and when to surrender to custody; or

(b)

arrange for the court officer to give the defendant, as soon as practicable, notice of where and when to surrender to custody.

(7)

This rule does not apply on an application to a magistrates’ court to authorise an extension of pre-charge bail.

[Note. See section 5 of the Bail Act 1976 and sections 93(7) and 102(4) of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012313.

Under sections 57A and 57B of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998314 and under regulation 79(3) of the Criminal Justice and Data Protection (Protocol No. 36) Regulations 2014315, a defendant is to be treated as present in court when, by virtue of a live link direction within the meaning of those provisions, he or she attends a hearing through a live link.

Under section 91 of the 2012 Act, instead of granting bail to a defendant under 18 the court may—

(a)

remand him or her to local authority accommodation and, after consulting with that authority, impose on the defendant a condition that the court could impose if granting bail; or

(b)

remand him or her to youth detention accommodation, if the defendant is at least 12 years old and the other conditions, about the offence and the defendant, prescribed by the Act are met.

See also rule 14.20 (Exercise of court’s powers: extension of pre-charge bail).]

Duty of justices’ legal adviser14.3.

(1)

This rule applies—

(a)

only in a magistrates’ court; and

(b)

unless the court—

(i)

includes a District Judge (Magistrates’ Courts), and

(ii)

otherwise directs.

(2)

A justices’ legal adviser must—

(a)

assist an unrepresented defendant;

(b)

give the court such advice as is required to enable it to exercise its powers; and

(c)

if required, attend the members of the court outside the courtroom to give such advice, but inform the parties of any advice so given.

[Note. For the functions of a justices’ legal adviser, see sections 28 and 29 of the Courts Act 2003316.]

General duties of court officer14.4.

(1)

The court officer must arrange for a note or other record to be made of—

(a)

the parties’ representations about bail; and

(b)

the court’s reasons for a decision—

(i)

to withhold bail, or to impose or vary a bail condition,

(ii)

to grant bail, where the prosecutor opposed the grant, or

(iii)

on an application to which rule 14.21 applies (Application to authorise extension of pre-charge bail).

(2)

The court officer must serve notice of a decision about bail on—

(a)

the defendant (but, in the Crown Court, only where the defendant’s legal representative asks for such a notice, or where the defendant has no legal representative);

(b)

the prosecutor (but only where the court granted bail, the prosecutor opposed the grant, and the prosecutor asks for such a notice);

(c)

a party to the decision who was absent when it was made;

(d)

a surety who is directly affected by the decision;

(e)

the defendant’s custodian, where the defendant is in custody and the decision requires the custodian—

(i)

to release the defendant (or will do so, if a requirement ordered by the court is met), or

(ii)

to transfer the defendant to the custody of another custodian; and

(f)

the court officer for any other court at which the defendant is required by that decision to surrender to custody.

(3)

Where the court postpones the date on which a defendant who is on bail must surrender to custody, the court officer must serve notice of the postponed date on—

(a)

the defendant; and

(b)

any surety.

(4)

Where a magistrates’ court withholds bail in a case to which section 5(6A) of the Bail Act 1976317 applies (remand in custody after hearing full argument on an application for bail), the court officer must serve on the defendant a certificate that the court heard full argument.

(5)

Where the court determines without a hearing an application to which rule 14.21 applies (Application to authorise extension of pre-charge bail), the court officer must—

(a)

if the court allows the application, notify the applicant; and

(b)

if the court refuses the application, notify the applicant and the defendant.

[Note. See section 5 of the Bail Act 1976318; section 43 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980319; and section 52 of the Mental Health Act 1983320.]

BAIL

Prosecutor’s representations about bail14.5.

(1)

This rule applies whenever the court can grant or withhold bail.

(2)

The prosecutor must as soon as practicable—

(a)

provide the defendant with all the information in the prosecutor’s possession which is material to what the court must decide; and

(b)

provide the court with the same information.

(3)

A prosecutor who opposes the grant of bail must specify—

(a)

each exception to the general right to bail on which the prosecutor relies; and

(b)

each consideration that the prosecutor thinks relevant.

(4)

A prosecutor who wants the court to impose a condition on any grant of bail must—

(a)

specify each condition proposed; and

(b)

explain what purpose would be served by such a condition.

[Note. A summary of the general entitlement to bail and of the exceptions to that entitlement is at the end of this Part.]

Reconsideration of police bail by magistrates’ court14.6.

(1)

This rule applies where—

(a)

a party wants a magistrates’ court to reconsider a bail decision by a police officer after the defendant is charged with an offence; and

(b)

a defendant wants a magistrates’ court to reconsider a bail condition imposed by a police officer before the defendant is charged with an offence.

(2)

An application under this rule must be made to—

(a)

the magistrates’ court to whose custody the defendant is under a duty to surrender, if any; or

(b)

any magistrates’ court acting for the police officer’s local justice area, in any other case.

(3)

The applicant party must—

(a)

apply in writing; and

(b)

serve the application on—

(i)

the court officer,

(ii)

the other party, and

(iii)

any surety affected or proposed.

(4)

The application must—

(a)

specify—

(i)

the decision that the applicant wants the court to make,

(ii)

each offence charged, or for which the defendant was arrested, and

(iii)

the police bail decision to be reconsidered and the reasons given for it;

(b)

explain, as appropriate—

(i)

why the court should grant bail itself, or withdraw it, or impose or vary a condition, and

(ii)

if the applicant is the prosecutor, what material information has become available since the police bail decision was made;

(c)

propose the terms of any suggested condition of bail; and

(d)

if the applicant wants an earlier hearing than paragraph (7) requires, ask for that, and explain why it is needed.

(5)

A prosecutor who applies under this rule must serve on the defendant, with the application, notice that the court has power to withdraw bail and, if the defendant is absent when the court makes its decision, order the defendant’s arrest.

(6)

A party who opposes an application must—

(a)

so notify the court officer and the applicant at once; and

(b)

serve on each notice of the reasons for opposition.

(7)

Unless the court otherwise directs, the court officer must arrange for the court to hear the application as soon as practicable and in any event—

(a)

if it is an application to withdraw bail, no later than the second business day after it was served; and

(b)

in any other case, no later than the fifth business day after it was served.

(8)

The court may—

(a)

vary or waive a time limit under this rule;

(b)

allow an application to be in a different form to one set out in the Practice Direction; and

(c)

if rule 14.2 allows, determine without a hearing an application to vary a condition.

[Note. The Practice Direction sets out a form of application for use in connection with this rule.

Under section 5B of the Bail Act 1976321—

(a)

where a defendant has been charged with an offence which can be tried in the Crown Court; or

(b)

in an extradition case,

on application by the prosecutor a magistrates’ court may withdraw bail granted by a constable, impose conditions of bail, or vary conditions of bail. See also sections 37, 37C(2)(b), 37CA(2)(b), 46A and 47(1B) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984322.

Under section 43B of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980323, where a defendant has been charged with an offence, on application by the defendant a magistrates’ court may grant bail itself, in substitution for bail granted by a custody officer, or vary the conditions of bail granted by a custody officer. See also sections 37, 37C(2)(b), 37CA(2)(b), 46A and 47(1C), (1D) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984324.

Under section 47(1E) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984325, where a defendant has been released on bail by a custody officer without being charged with an offence, on application by the defendant a magistrates’ court may vary any conditions of that bail. See also sections 37, 37C(2)(b), 37CA(2)(b), 46A and 47(1C) of the Act.]

Notice of application to consider bail14.7.

(1)

This rule applies where—

(a)

in a magistrates’ court—

(i)

a prosecutor wants the court to withdraw bail granted by the court, or to impose or vary a condition of such bail, or

(ii)

a defendant wants the court to reconsider such bail before the next hearing in the case; and

(b)

in the Crown Court—

(i)

a party wants the court to grant bail that has been withheld, or to withdraw bail that has been granted, or to impose a new bail condition or to vary a present one, or

(ii)

a prosecutor wants the court to consider whether to grant or withhold bail, or impose or vary a condition of bail, under section 88 or section 89 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003326 (bail and custody in connection with an intended application to the Court of Appeal to which Part 27 (Retrial after acquittal) applies).

(2)

Such a party must—

(a)

apply in writing;

(b)

serve the application on—

(i)

the court officer,

(ii)

the other party, and

(iii)

any surety affected or proposed; and

(c)

serve the application not less than 2 business days before any hearing in the case at which the applicant wants the court to consider it, if such a hearing is already due.

(3)

The application must—

(a)

specify—

(i)

the decision that the applicant wants the court to make,

(ii)

each offence charged, and

(iii)

each relevant previous bail decision and the reasons given for each;

(b)

if the applicant is a defendant, explain—

(i)

as appropriate, why the court should not withhold bail, or why it should vary a condition, and

(ii)

what further information or legal argument, if any, has become available since the most recent previous bail decision was made;

(c)

if the applicant is the prosecutor, explain—

(i)

as appropriate, why the court should withdraw bail, or impose or vary a condition, and

(ii)

what material information has become available since the most recent previous bail decision was made;

(d)

propose the terms of any suggested condition of bail; and

(e)

if the applicant wants an earlier hearing than paragraph (6) requires, ask for that, and explain why it is needed.

(4)

(5)

A party who opposes an application must—

(a)

so notify the court officer and the applicant at once; and

(b)

serve on each notice of the reasons for opposition.

(6)

Unless the court otherwise directs, the court officer must arrange for the court to hear the application as soon as practicable and in any event—

(a)

if it is an application to grant or withdraw bail, no later than the second business day after it was served; and

(b)

if it is an application to impose or vary a condition, no later than the fifth business day after it was served.

(7)

The court may—

(a)

vary or waive a time limit under this rule;

(b)

allow an application to be in a different form to one set out in the Practice Direction, or to be made orally; and

(c)

if rule 14.2 allows, determine without a hearing an application to vary a condition.

[Note. The Practice Direction sets out a form of application for use in connection with this rule, and forms of application, draft order and certificate for use where an applicant wants the court to exercise the powers to which rule 14.16 applies (Bail condition to be enforced in another European Union member State).

In addition to the court’s general powers in relation to bail—

(a)

under section 3(8) of the Bail Act 1976327, on application by either party the court may impose a bail condition or vary a condition it has imposed. Until the Crown Court makes its first bail decision in the case, a magistrates’ court may vary a condition which it imposed on committing or sending a defendant for Crown Court trial.

(b)

under section 5B of the Bail Act 1976328, where the defendant is on bail and the offence is one which can be tried in the Crown Court, or in an extradition case, on application by the prosecutor a magistrates’ court may withdraw bail, impose conditions of bail or vary the conditions of bail.

(c)

under sections 88 and 89 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, the Crown Court may remand in custody, or grant bail to, a defendant pending an application to the Court of Appeal for an order for retrial under section 77 of that Act.

Under Part IIA of Schedule 1 to the Bail Act 1976329, if the court withholds bail then at the first hearing after that the defendant may support an application for bail with any argument as to fact or law, whether or not that argument has been advanced before. At subsequent hearings, the court need not hear arguments which it has heard previously.]

Defendant’s application or appeal to the Crown Court after magistrates’ court bail decision14.8.

(1)

This rule applies where a defendant wants to—

(a)

apply to the Crown Court for bail after a magistrates’ court has withheld bail; or

(b)

appeal to the Crown Court after a magistrates’ court has refused to vary a bail condition as the defendant wants.

(2)

The defendant must—

(a)

apply to the Crown Court in writing as soon as practicable after the magistrates’ court’s decision; and

(b)

serve the application on—

(i)

the Crown Court officer,

(ii)

the magistrates’ court officer,

(iii)

the prosecutor, and

(iv)

any surety affected or proposed.

(3)

The application must—

(a)

specify—

(i)

the decision that the applicant wants the Crown Court to make, and

(ii)

each offence charged;

(b)

explain—

(i)

as appropriate, why the Crown Court should not withhold bail, or why it should vary the condition under appeal, and

(ii)

what further information or legal argument, if any, has become available since the magistrates’ court’s decision;

(c)

propose the terms of any suggested condition of bail;

(d)

if the applicant wants an earlier hearing than paragraph (6) requires, ask for that, and explain why it is needed; and

(e)

on an application for bail, attach a copy of the certificate of full argument served on the defendant under rule 14.4(4).

(4)

The magistrates’ court officer must as soon as practicable serve on the Crown Court officer—

(a)

a copy of the note or record made under rule 14.4(1) in connection with the magistrates’ court’s decision; and

(b)

the date of the next hearing, if any, in the magistrates’ court.

(5)

A prosecutor who opposes the application must—

(a)

so notify the Crown Court officer and the defendant at once; and

(b)

serve on each notice of the reasons for opposition.

(6)

Unless the Crown Court otherwise directs, the court officer must arrange for the court to hear the application or appeal as soon as practicable and in any event no later than the business day after it was served.

(7)

The Crown Court may vary a time limit under this rule.

[Note. The Practice Direction sets out a form of application for use in connection with this rule.

Under section 81 of the Senior Courts Act 1981330, the Crown Court may grant bail in a magistrates’ court case in which the magistrates’ court has withheld bail.

Under section 16 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003331, a defendant may appeal to the Crown Court against a bail condition imposed by a magistrates’ court only where—

(a)

the condition is one that the defendant must—

(i)

live and sleep at a specified place, or away from a specified place,

(ii)

give a surety or a security,

(iii)

stay indoors between specified hours,

(iv)

comply with electronic monitoring requirements, or

(v)

make no contact with a specified person; and

(b)

the magistrates’ court has determined an application by either party to vary that condition.

In an extradition case, where a magistrates’ court withholds bail or imposes bail conditions, on application by the defendant the High Court may grant bail, or vary the conditions, under section 22 of the Criminal Justice Act 1967332. For the procedure in the High Court, see Schedule 1 to the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (RSC Order 79)333.]

Prosecutor’s appeal against grant of bail14.9.

(1)

This rule applies where a prosecutor wants to appeal—

(a)

to the Crown Court against a grant of bail by a magistrates’ court, in a case in which the defendant has been charged with, or convicted of, an offence punishable with imprisonment; or

(b)

to the High Court against a grant of bail—

(i)

by a magistrates’ court, in an extradition case, or

(ii)

by the Crown Court, in a case in which the defendant has been charged with, or convicted of, an offence punishable with imprisonment (but not in a case in which the Crown Court granted bail on an appeal to which paragraph (1)(a) applies).

(2)

The prosecutor must tell the court which has granted bail of the decision to appeal—

(a)

at the end of the hearing during which the court granted bail; and

(b)

before the defendant is released on bail.

(3)

The court which has granted bail must exercise its power to remand the defendant in custody pending determination of the appeal.

(4)

The prosecutor must serve an appeal notice—

(a)

on the court officer for the court which has granted bail and on the defendant; and

(b)

not more than 2 hours after telling that court of the decision to appeal.

(5)

The appeal notice must specify—

(a)

each offence with which the defendant is charged;

(b)

the decision under appeal;

(c)

the reasons given for the grant of bail; and

(d)

the grounds of appeal.

(6)

On an appeal to the Crown Court, the magistrates’ court officer must, as soon as practicable, serve on the Crown Court officer—

(a)

the appeal notice;

(b)

a copy of the note or record made under rule 14.4(1) (record of bail decision); and

(c)

notice of the date of the next hearing in the court which has granted bail.

(7)

If the Crown Court so directs, the Crown Court officer must arrange for the defendant to be assisted by the Official Solicitor in a case in which the defendant—

(a)

has no legal representative; and

(b)

asks for such assistance.

(8)

On an appeal to the Crown Court, the Crown Court officer must arrange for the court to hear the appeal as soon as practicable and in any event no later than the second business day after the appeal notice was served.

(9)

The prosecutor—

(a)

may abandon an appeal to the Crown Court without the court’s permission, by serving a notice of abandonment, signed by or on behalf of the prosecutor, on—

(i)

the defendant,

(ii)

the Crown Court officer, and

(iii)

the magistrates’ court officer

before the hearing of the appeal begins; but

(b)

after the hearing of the appeal begins, may only abandon the appeal with the Crown Court’s permission.

(10)

The court officer for the court which has granted bail must instruct the defendant’s custodian to release the defendant on the bail granted by that court, subject to any condition or conditions of bail imposed, if—

(a)

the prosecutor fails to serve an appeal notice within the time to which paragraph (4) refers; or

(b)

the prosecutor serves a notice of abandonment under paragraph (9).

[Note. See section 1 of the Bail (Amendment) Act 1993334. The time limit for serving an appeal notice is prescribed by section 1(5) of the Act. It may be neither extended nor shortened.

For the procedure in the High Court, see Schedule 1 to the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (RSC Order 79, rule 9) and the Practice Direction which supplements that Order. Under those provisions, the prosecutor must file in the High Court, among other things—

(a)

a copy of the appeal notice served by the prosecutor under rule 14.9(4);

(b)

notice of the Crown Court decision to grant bail served on the prosecutor under rule 14.4(2); and

(c)

notice of the date of the next hearing in the Crown Court.]

Consideration of bail in a murder case14.10.

(1)

This rule applies in a case in which—

(a)

the defendant is charged with murder; and

(b)

the Crown Court has not yet considered bail.

(2)

The magistrates’ court officer must arrange with the Crown Court officer for the Crown Court to consider bail as soon as practicable and in any event no later than the second business day after—

(a)

a magistrates’ court sends the defendant to the Crown Court for trial; or

(b)

the first hearing in the magistrates’ court, if the defendant is not at once sent for trial.

[Note. See section 115 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009335.]

Condition of residence14.11.

(1)

The defendant must notify the prosecutor of the address at which the defendant will live and sleep if released on bail with a condition of residence—

(a)

as soon as practicable after the institution of proceedings, unless already done; and

(b)

as soon as practicable after any change of that address.

(2)

The prosecutor must help the court to assess the suitability of an address proposed as a condition of residence.

Electronic monitoring requirements14.12.

(1)

This rule applies where the court imposes electronic monitoring requirements, where available, as a condition of bail.

(2)

The court officer must—

(a)

inform the person responsible for the monitoring (‘the monitor’) of—

(i)

the defendant’s name, and telephone number if available,

(ii)

each offence with which the defendant is charged,

(iii)

details of the place at which the defendant’s presence must be monitored,

(iv)

the period or periods during which the defendant’s presence at that place must be monitored, and

(v)

if fixed, the date on which the defendant must surrender to custody;

(b)

inform the defendant and, where the defendant is under 16, an appropriate adult, of the monitor’s identity and the means by which the monitor may be contacted; and

(c)

notify the monitor of any subsequent—

(i)

variation or termination of the electronic monitoring requirements, or

(ii)

fixing or variation of the date on which the defendant must surrender to custody.

[Note. Under section 3(6ZAA) of the Bail Act 1976336, the conditions of bail that the court may impose include requirements for the electronic monitoring of a defendant’s compliance with other bail conditions, for example a curfew. Sections 3AA and 3AB of the 1976 Act337 set out conditions for imposing such requirements.

Under section 3AC of the 1976 Act338, where the court imposes electronic monitoring requirements they must provide for the appointment of a monitor.]

Accommodation or support requirements14.13.

(1)

This rule applies where the court imposes as a condition of bail a requirement, where available, that the defendant must—

(a)

reside in accommodation provided for that purpose by, or on behalf of, a public authority; or

(b)

receive bail support provided by, or on behalf of, a public authority.

(2)

The court officer must—

(a)

inform the person responsible for the provision of any such accommodation or support (‘the service provider’) of—

(i)

the defendant’s name, and telephone number if available,

(ii)

each offence with which the defendant is charged,

(iii)

details of the requirement,

(iv)

any other bail condition, and

(v)

if fixed, the date on which the defendant must surrender to custody;

(b)

inform the defendant and, where the defendant is under 16, an appropriate adult, of—

(i)

the service provider’s identity and the means by which the service provider may be contacted, and

(ii)

the address of any accommodation in which the defendant must live and sleep; and

(c)

notify the service provider of any subsequent—

(i)

variation or termination of the requirement,

(ii)

variation or termination of any other bail condition, and

(iii)

fixing or variation of the date on which the defendant must surrender to custody.

Requirement for a surety or payment, etc.14.14.

(1)

This rule applies where the court imposes as a condition of bail a requirement for—

(a)

a surety;

(b)

a payment; or

(c)

the surrender of a document or thing.

(2)

The court may direct how such a condition must be met.

(3)

Unless the court otherwise directs, if any such condition or direction requires a surety to enter into a recognizance—

(a)

the recognizance must specify—

(i)

the amount that the surety will be required to pay if the purpose for which the recognizance is entered is not fulfilled, and

(ii)

the date, or the event, upon which the recognizance will expire;

(b)

the surety must enter into the recognizance in the presence of—

(i)

the court officer,

(ii)

the defendant’s custodian, where the defendant is in custody, or

(iii)

someone acting with the authority of either; and

(c)

the person before whom the surety enters into the recognizance must at once serve a copy on—

(i)

the surety, and

(ii)

as appropriate, the court officer and the defendant’s custodian.

(4)

Unless the court otherwise directs, if any such condition or direction requires someone to make a payment, or surrender a document or thing—

(a)

that payment, document or thing must be made or surrendered to—

(i)

the court officer,

(ii)

the defendant’s custodian, where the defendant is in custody, or

(iii)

someone acting with the authority of either; and

(b)

the court officer or the custodian, as appropriate, must serve immediately on the other a statement that the payment, document or thing has been made or surrendered.

(5)

The custodian must release the defendant when each requirement ordered by the court has been met.

[Note. See also section 119 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980339.]

Forfeiture of a recognizance given by a surety14.15.

(1)

This rule applies where the court imposes as a condition of bail a requirement that a surety enter into a recognizance and, after the defendant is released on bail,—

(a)

the defendant fails to surrender to custody as required, or

(b)

it appears to the court that the surety has failed to comply with a condition or direction.

(2)

The court officer must serve notice on—

(a)

the surety; and

(b)

each party to the decision to grant bail,

of the hearing at which the court will consider the forfeiture of the recognizance.

(3)

The court must not forfeit the recognizance less than 5 business days after service of notice under paragraph (2).

[Note. If the purpose for which a recognizance is entered is not fulfilled, that recognizance may be forfeited by the court. If the court forfeits a surety’s recognizance, the sum promised by that person is then payable to the Crown. See also section 120 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980340.]

Bail condition to be enforced in another European Union member State14.16.

(1)

This rule applies where the court can impose as a condition of bail pending trial a requirement—

(a)

with which the defendant must comply while in another European Union member State; and

(b)

which that other member State can monitor and enforce.

(2)

The court—

(a)

must not exercise its power to impose such a requirement until the court has decided what, if any, condition or conditions of bail to impose while the defendant is in England and Wales; but

(b)

subject to that, may exercise its power to make a request for the other member State to monitor and enforce that requirement.

(3)

Where the court makes such a request, the court officer must—

(a)

issue a certificate requesting the monitoring and enforcement of the defendant’s compliance with that requirement, in the form required by EU Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA;

(b)

serve on the relevant authority of the other member State—

(i)

the court’s decision or a certified copy of that decision,

(ii)

the certificate, and

(iii)

a copy of the certificate translated into an official language of the other member State, unless English is such a language or the other member State has declared that it will accept a certificate in English; and

(c)

report to the court—

(i)

any request for further information returned by the competent authority in the other member State, and

(ii)

that authority’s decision.

(4)

Where the competent authority in the other member State agrees to monitor and enforce the requirement—

(a)

the court—

(i)

may exercise its power to withdraw the request (where it can), but

(ii)

whether or not it does so, must continue to exercise the powers to which this Part applies in accordance with the rules in this Part;

(b)

the court officer must immediately serve notice on that authority if—

(i)

legal proceedings are brought in relation to the requirement being monitored and enforced, or

(ii)

the court decides to vary or revoke that requirement, or to issue a warrant for the defendant’s arrest; and

(c)

the court officer must promptly report to the court any information and any request received from that authority.

(5)

A party who wants the court to exercise the power to which this rule applies must serve with an application under rule 14.7 (Notice of application to consider bail)—

(a)

a draft order; and

(b)

a draft certificate in the form required by EU Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA.

[Note. The Practice Direction sets out a form of application under rule 14.7 and forms of draft order and certificate for use in connection with this rule.

See regulations 77 to 84 of the Criminal Justice and Data Protection (Protocol No. 36) Regulations 2014341.

Where a defendant is to live or stay in another European Union member State pending trial in England and Wales, the court may grant bail subject to a requirement to be monitored and enforced by the competent authority in that other state. The types of requirement that can be monitored and enforced are set out in Article 8 of EU Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA. A list of those requirements is at the end of this Part.

Under regulation 80 of the 2014 Regulations, where the conditions listed in that regulation are met the court may withdraw a request for the competent authority in another member State to monitor and enforce the defendant’s compliance with a requirement.]

Enforcement of measure imposed in another European Union member State14.17.

(1)

This rule applies where the Lord Chancellor serves on the court officer a certificate requesting the monitoring and enforcement of a defendant’s compliance with a supervision measure imposed by an authority in another European Union member State.

(2)

The court officer must arrange for the court to consider the request—

(a)

as a general rule—

(i)

within 20 business days of the date on which the Lord Chancellor received it from the requesting authority, or

(ii)

within 40 business days of that date, if legal proceedings in relation to the supervision measure are brought within the first 20 business days; but

(b)

exceptionally, later than that, and in such a case the court officer must immediately serve on the requesting authority—

(i)

an explanation for the delay, and

(ii)

an indication of when the court’s decision is expected.

(3)

On consideration of the request by the court, the court officer must—

(a)

without delay serve on the requesting authority—

(i)

notice of any further information required by the court, and

(ii)

subject to any such requirement and any response, notice of the court’s decision; and

(b)

where the court agrees to monitor the supervision measure, serve notice of the court’s decision on any supervisor specified by the court.

(4)

Where the court agrees to monitor the supervision measure—

(a)

the court officer must immediately serve notice on the requesting authority if there is reported to the court—

(i)

a breach of the measure, or

(ii)

any other event that might cause the requesting authority to review its decision; and

(b)

the court officer must without delay serve notice on the requesting authority if—

(i)

legal proceedings are brought in relation to the decision to monitor compliance with the bail condition,

(ii)

there is reported to the court a change of the defendant’s residence, or

(iii)

the court decides (where it can) to stop monitoring the defendant’s compliance with the measure.

[Note. See regulations 85 to 94 of the Criminal Justice and Data Protection (Protocol No. 36) Regulations 2014.

Where the Lord Chancellor receives a request for the monitoring and enforcement in England and Wales of a supervision measure ordered in another European Union member State, a magistrates’ court to which the request is given must monitor and enforce that measure unless one of the specified grounds for refusal applies. The grounds for refusal are listed at the end of this Part.

Under regulation 91 of the 2014 Regulations, the defendant may be arrested for breach of the measure and subsequently detained by the court for up to 28 days (or 21 days, in the case of a defendant who is under 18).

Under regulation 90 of the 2014 Regulations, the magistrates’ court may cease the monitoring and enforcement where the requesting authority takes no further decision in response to notice of a breach of the measure. Under regulation 93, the court ceases to be responsible for the monitoring and enforcement of the measure where regulation 90 applies and in the other cases listed in regulation 93.]

CUSTODY TIME LIMITS

Application to extend a custody time limit14.18.

(1)

This rule applies where the prosecutor gives notice of application to extend a custody time limit.

(2)

The court officer must arrange for the court to hear that application as soon as practicable after the expiry of—

(a)

5 days from the giving of notice, in the Crown Court; or

(b)

2 days from the giving of notice, in a magistrates’ court.

(3)

The court may shorten a time limit under this rule.

[Note. See regulation 7 of the Prosecution of Offences (Custody Time Limits) Regulations 1987342.

Under regulations 4 and 5 of the 1987 Regulations343, unless the court extends the time limit the maximum period during which the defendant may be in pre-trial custody is—

(a)

in a case which can be tried only in a magistrates’ court, 56 days pending the beginning of the trial;

(b)

in a magistrates’ court, in a case which can be tried either in that court or in the Crown Court—

(i)

70 days, pending the beginning of a trial in the magistrates’ court, or

(ii)

56 days, pending the beginning of a trial in the magistrates’ court, if the court decides on such a trial during that period;

(c)

in the Crown Court, pending the beginning of the trial, 182 days from the sending of the defendant for trial, less any period or periods during which the defendant was in custody in the magistrates’ court.

Under section 22(3) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985344, the court cannot extend a custody time limit which has expired, and must not extend such a time limit unless satisfied—

(a)

that the need for the extension is due to—

(i)

the illness or absence of the accused, a necessary witness, a judge or a magistrate,

(ii)

a postponement which is occasioned by the ordering by the court of separate trials in the case of two or more defendants or two or more offences, or

(iii)

some other good and sufficient cause; and

(b)

that the prosecution has acted with all due diligence and expedition.]

Appeal against custody time limit decision14.19.

(1)

This rule applies where—

(a)

a defendant wants to appeal to the Crown Court against a decision by a magistrates’ court to extend a custody time limit; or

(b)

a prosecutor wants to appeal to the Crown Court against a decision by a magistrates’ court to refuse to extend a custody time limit.

(2)

The appellant must serve an appeal notice—

(a)

on—

(i)

the other party to the decision,

(ii)

the Crown Court officer, and

(iii)

the magistrates’ court officer;

(b)

in a defendant’s appeal, as soon as practicable after the decision under appeal; and

(c)

in a prosecutor’s appeal—

(i)

as soon as practicable after the decision under appeal, and

(ii)

before the relevant custody time limit expires.

(3)

The appeal notice must specify—

(a)

each offence with which the defendant is charged;

(b)

the decision under appeal;

(c)

the date on which the relevant custody time limit will expire;

(d)

on a defendant’s appeal, the date on which the relevant custody time limit would have expired but for the decision under appeal; and

(e)

the grounds of appeal.

(4)

The Crown Court officer must arrange for the Crown Court to hear the appeal as soon as practicable and in any event no later than the second business day after the appeal notice was served.

(5)

The appellant—

(a)

may abandon an appeal without the Crown Court’s permission, by serving a notice of abandonment, signed by or on behalf of the appellant, on—

(i)

the other party,

(ii)

the Crown Court officer, and

(iii)

the magistrates’ court officer

before the hearing of the appeal begins; but

(b)

after the hearing of the appeal begins, may only abandon the appeal with the Crown Court’s permission.

[Note. See section 22(7), (8), (9) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985345.]

EXTENSION OF BAIL BEFORE CHARGE

Exercise of court’s powers: extension of pre-charge bail14.20.

(1)

The court must determine an application to which rule 14.21 (Application to authorise extension of pre-charge bail) applies—

(a)

without a hearing, subject to paragraph (2); and

(b)

as soon as practicable, but as a general rule no sooner than the fifth business day after the application was served.

(2)

The court must determine an application at a hearing where—

(a)

if the application succeeds, its effect will be to extend the period for which the defendant is on bail to less than 12 months from the day after the defendant’s arrest for the offence and the court considers that the interests of justice require a hearing;

(b)

if the application succeeds, its effect will be to extend that period to more than 12 months from that day and the applicant or the defendant asks for a hearing; or

(c)

it is an application to withhold information from the defendant and the court considers that the interests of justice require a hearing.

(3)

Any hearing must be in private.

(4)

Subject to rule 14.22 (Application to withhold information from the defendant), at a hearing the court may determine an application in the absence of—

(a)

the applicant; and

(b)

the defendant, if the defendant has had at least 5 business days in which to make representations.

(5)

If the court so directs, a party to an application may attend a hearing by live link or telephone.

(6)

The court must not authorise an extension of the period for which a defendant is on bail before being charged unless—

(a)

the applicant states, in writing or orally, that to the best of the applicant’s knowledge and belief—

(i)

the application discloses all the information that is material to what the court must decide, and

(ii)

the content of the application is true; or

(b)

the application includes a statement by an investigator of the suspected offence that to the best of that investigator’s knowledge and belief those requirements are met.

(7)

Where the statement required by paragraph (6) is made orally—

(a)

the statement must be on oath or affirmation, unless the court otherwise directs; and

(b)

the court must arrange for a record of the making of the statement.

(8)

The court may shorten or extend (even after it has expired) a time limit imposed by this rule or by rule 14.21 (Application to authorise extension of pre-charge bail).

[Note. For the definition of ‘defendant’ for the purposes of this rule and rules 14.21 and 14.22, see rule 14.1(3).

Sections 47ZA and 47ZB of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984346 limit the period during which a defendant who has been arrested for an offence may be on bail after being released without being charged. That period (‘the applicable bail period’) is—

(a)

3 months from the day after the day on which the defendant was arrested (the defendant’s ‘bail start date’) in ‘an SFO case’ (that is, a case investigated by the Serious Fraud Office);

(b)

28 days from the defendant’s bail start date in ‘a standard case’ (that is, ‘an FCA case’, meaning a case investigated by the Financial Conduct Authority, or any other non-SFO case).

Under sections 47ZC and 47ZD of the 1984347 Act, in a standard case the applicable bail period may be extended on the authority of a police officer of the rank of superintendent or above until the end of 3 months from the bail start date.

Under sections 47ZC and 47ZE of the Act348, if the case is designated by a qualifying prosecutor as exceptionally complex (a ‘designated case’) the applicable bail period may be extended, in an SFO case, or further extended, in a standard case, on the authority of one of the senior officers listed in section 47ZE, until the end of 6 months from the bail start date.

Under section 47ZF of the Act349, on an application made before the date on which the applicable bail period ends by a member of the Serious Fraud Office, a member of staff of the Financial Conduct Authority, a constable or a Crown Prosecutor, a magistrates’ court may authorise an extension of that period—

(a)

from a previous total of 3 months to a new total of 6 months or, if the investigation is unlikely to be completed or a police charging decision made within a lesser period, a new total of 9 months;

(b)

from a previous total of 6 months to a new total of 9 months or, if the investigation is unlikely to be completed or a police charging decision made within a lesser period, a new total of 12 months,

where the conditions listed in that section are met.

Under section 47ZG of the Act350, on a further such application (of which there may be more than one) a magistrates’ court may authorise a further extension of the applicable bail period, on each occasion by a further 3 months or, if the investigation is unlikely to be completed or a police charging decision made within a lesser period, a further 6 months, where the conditions listed in that section are met.

Under section 47ZL of the Act351, the running of the applicable bail period does not begin (in the case of a first release on bail) or is suspended (in any other case) where—

(a)

the defendant is released on bail to await a charging decision by the Director of Public Prosecutions under section 37B of the Act; or

(b)

following arrest for breach of such bail the defendant is again released on bail.

The court’s authority therefore is not required for an extension of an applicable bail period the running of which is postponed or suspended pending a Director’s charging decision. However—

(a)

time runs in any period during which information requested by the Director is being obtained; and

(b)

if the Director requests information less than 7 days before the applicable bail period otherwise would end then the running of that period is further suspended until the end of 7 days beginning with the day on which the Director’s request is made.

See also section 47ZI of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984352 (Sections 47ZF to 47ZH: proceedings in magistrates’ courts). The requirement for the court except in specified circumstances to determine an application without a hearing is prescribed by that section. Under that section the court must comprise a single justice of the peace unless a hearing is convened, when it must comprise two or more justices.]

Application to authorise extension of pre-charge bail14.21.

(1)

This rule applies where an applicant wants the court to authorise an extension of the period for which a defendant is released on bail before being charged with an offence.

(2)

The applicant must—

(a)

apply in writing before the date on which the defendant’s pre-charge bail is due to end;

(b)

demonstrate that the applicant is entitled to apply as a constable, a member of staff of the Financial Conduct Authority, a member of the Serious Fraud Office or a Crown Prosecutor;

(c)

serve the application on—

(i)

the court officer, and

(ii)

the defendant; and

(d)

serve on the defendant, with the application, a form of response notice for the defendant’s use.

(3)

The application must specify—

(a)

the offence or offences for which the defendant was arrested;

(b)

the date on which the defendant’s pre-charge bail began;

(c)

the date and period of any previous extension of that bail;

(d)

the date on which that bail is due to end;

(e)

the conditions of that bail; and

(f)

if different, the bail conditions which are to be imposed if the court authorises an extension, or further extension, of the period for which the defendant is released on pre-charge bail.

(4)

The application must explain—

(a)

the grounds for believing that, as applicable—

(i)

further investigation is needed of any matter in connection with the offence or offences for which the defendant was released on bail, or

(ii)

further time is needed for making a decision as to whether to charge the defendant with that offence or those offences;

(b)

the grounds for believing that, as applicable—

(i)

the investigation into the offence or offences for which the defendant was released on bail is being conducted diligently and expeditiously, or

(ii)

the decision as to whether to charge the defendant with that offence or those offences is being made diligently and expeditiously; and

(c)

the grounds for believing that the defendant’s further release on bail is necessary and proportionate in all the circumstances having regard, in particular, to any conditions of bail imposed.

(5)

The application must—

(a)

indicate whether the applicant wants the court to authorise an extension of the defendant’s bail for 3 months or for 6 months; and

(b)

if for 6 months, explain why the investigation is unlikely to be completed or the charging decision made, as the case may be, within 3 months.

(6)

The application must explain why it was not made earlier where—

(a)

the application is made before the date on which the defendant’s bail is due to end; but

(b)

it is not likely to be practicable for the court to determine the application before that date.

(7)

A defendant who objects to the application must—

(a)

serve notice on—

(i)

the court officer, and

(ii)

the applicant

not more than 5 business days after service of the application; and

(b)

in the notice explain the grounds of the objection.

[Note. The Practice Direction sets out forms of application and response notice for use in connection with this rule.

See sections 47ZF (Applicable bail period: first extension of limit by the court), 47ZG (Applicable bail period: subsequent extensions of limit by the court) and 47ZJ (Sections 47ZF and 47ZG: late applications to magistrates’ court) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984353.

The time limit for making an application is prescribed by section 47ZF(2) and by section 47ZG(2) of the 1984 Act. It may be neither extended nor shortened. Under section 47ZJ(2) of the Act, if it is not practicable for the court to determine the application before the applicable bail period ends then the court must determine the application as soon as practicable. Under section 47ZJ(3), the applicable bail period is treated as extended until the application is determined. Under section 47ZJ(4), if it appears to the court that it would have been reasonable for the application to have been made in time for it to be determined by the court before the end of the applicable bail period then the court may refuse the application.]

Application to withhold information from the defendant14.22.

(1)

This rule applies where an application to authorise an extension of pre-charge bail includes an application to withhold information from the defendant.

(2)

The applicant must—

(a)

omit that information from the part of the application that is served on the defendant;

(b)

mark the other part to show that, unless the court otherwise directs, it is only for the court; and

(c)

in that other part, explain the grounds for believing that the disclosure of that information would have one or more of the following results—

(i)

evidence connected with an indictable offence would be interfered with or harmed,

(ii)

a person would be interfered with or physically injured,

(iii)

a person suspected of having committed an indictable offence but not yet arrested for the offence would be alerted, or

(iv)

the recovery of property obtained as a result of an indictable offence would be hindered.

(3)

At any hearing of an application to which this rule applies—

(a)

the court must first determine the application to withhold information, in the defendant’s absence and that of any legal representative of the defendant; and

(b)

if the court allows the application to withhold information, then in the following sequence—

(i)

the court must consider representations first by the applicant and then by the defendant, in the presence of both, and

(ii)

the court may consider further representations by the applicant in the defendant’s absence and that of any legal representative of the defendant, if satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that information withheld from the defendant would be disclosed during those further representations.

(4)

If the court refuses an application to withhold information from the defendant, the applicant may withdraw the application to authorise an extension of pre-charge bail.

[Note. See sections 47ZH and 47ZI(5), (6), (8) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984354 (withholding sensitive information; proceedings in magistrates’ courts: determination of applications to withhold sensitive information).]

Summary of the general entitlement to bail and of the exceptions

The court must consider bail whenever it can order the defendant’s detention pending trial or sentencing, or in an extradition case, and whether an application is made or not. Under section 4 of the Bail Act 1976355, the general rule, subject to exceptions, is that a defendant must be granted bail. Under Part IIA of Schedule 1 to the Act356, if the court decides not to grant the defendant bail then at each subsequent hearing the court must consider whether to grant bail.

Section 3 of the Bail Act 1976357 allows the court, before granting bail, to require a surety or security to secure the defendant’s surrender to custody; and allows the court, on granting bail, to impose such requirements as appear to the court to be necessary—

(a)

to secure that the defendant surrenders to custody;

(b)

to secure that the defendant does not commit an offence while on bail;

(c)

to secure that the defendant does not interfere with witnesses or otherwise obstruct the course of justice whether in relation to the defendant or any other person;

(d)

for the defendant’s own protection or, if a child or young person, for the defendant’s welfare or in the defendant’s own interests;

(e)

to secure the defendant’s availability for the purpose of enabling enquiries or a report to be made to assist the court in dealing with the defendant for the offence;

(f)

to secure that before the time appointed for surrender to custody the defendant attends an interview with a legal representative.

Under section 3 of the Bail Act 1976, a person granted bail in criminal proceedings is under a duty to surrender to custody as required by that bail. Under section 6 of the Act, such a person who fails without reasonable cause so to surrender commits an offence and, under section 7, may be arrested.

Exceptions to the general right to bail are listed in Schedule 1 to the Bail Act 1976358. They differ according to the category of offence concerned. Under section 4(2B) of the 1976 Act359, in an extradition case there is no general right to bail where the defendant is alleged to have been convicted in the territory requesting extradition.

Under Part I of Schedule 1 to the 1976 Act, where the offence is punishable with imprisonment, and is not one that can be tried only in a magistrates’ court, or in an extradition case—

(a)

the defendant need not be granted bail if the court is satisfied that—

(i)

there are substantial grounds for believing that, if released on bail (with or without conditions), the defendant would fail to surrender to custody, would commit an offence, or would interfere with witnesses or otherwise obstruct the course of justice,

(ii)

there are substantial grounds for believing that, if released on bail (with or without conditions), the defendant would commit an offence by engaging in conduct that would, or would be likely to, cause physical or mental injury to an associated person (within the meaning of section 33 of the Family Law Act 1996360), or cause that person to fear injury,

(iii)

the defendant should be kept in custody for his or her own protection or welfare, or

(iv)

it has not been practicable, for want of time since the institution of the proceedings, to obtain sufficient information for the court to take the decisions required;

(b)

the defendant need not be granted bail if it appears to the court that the defendant was on bail at the time of the offence (this exception does not apply in an extradition case);

(c)

the defendant need not be granted bail if, having been released on bail in the case on a previous occasion, the defendant since has been arrested for breach of bail;

(d)

the defendant need not be granted bail if in custody pursuant to a sentence;

(e)

the defendant need not be granted bail if it appears to the court that it would be impracticable to complete enquiries or a report for which the case is to be adjourned without keeping the defendant in custody;

(f)

the defendant may not be granted bail if charged with murder, unless the court is of the opinion that there is no significant risk of the defendant committing an offence while on bail that would, or would be likely to, cause physical or mental injury to some other person;

(g)

the defendant in an extradition case need not be granted bail if he or she was on bail on the date of the alleged offence and that offence is not one that could be tried only in a magistrates’ court if it were committed in England or Wales.

Exceptions (a)(i), (b) and (c) do not apply where—

(a)

the defendant is 18 or over;

(b)

the defendant has not been convicted of an offence in those proceedings; and

(c)

it appears to the court that there is no real prospect that the defendant will be sentenced to a custodial sentence in those proceedings.

In deciding whether an exception to the right to bail applies the court must have regard to any relevant consideration, including—

(a)

the nature and seriousness of the offence, and the probable method of dealing with the defendant for it;

(b)

the character, antecedents, associations and community ties of the defendant;

(c)

the defendant’s record of fulfilling obligations imposed under previous grants of bail; and

(d)

except where the case is adjourned for enquires or a report, the strength of the evidence of the defendant having committed the offence.

Under Part IA of Schedule 1 to the 1976 Act, where the offence is punishable with imprisonment, and is one that can be tried only in a magistrates’ court—

(a)

the defendant need not be granted bail if it appears to the court that—

(i)

having previously been granted bail in criminal proceedings, the defendant has failed to surrender as required and, in view of that failure, the court believes that, if released on bail (with or without conditions), the defendant would fail to surrender to custody, or

(ii)

the defendant was on bail on the date of the offence and the court is satisfied that there are substantial grounds for believing that, if released on bail (with or without conditions), the defendant would commit an offence while on bail;

(b)

the defendant need not be granted bail if the court is satisfied that—

(i)

there are substantial grounds for believing that, if released on bail (with or without conditions), the defendant would commit an offence while on bail by engaging in conduct that would, or would be likely to, cause physical or mental injury to some other person, or cause some other person to fear such injury,

(ii)

the defendant should be kept in custody for his or her own protection or welfare, or

(iii)

it has not been practicable, for want of time since the institution of the proceedings, to obtain sufficient information for the court to take the decisions required;

(c)

the defendant need not be granted bail if in custody pursuant to a sentence;

(d)

the defendant need not be granted bail if, having been released on bail in the case on a previous occasion, the defendant since has been arrested for breach of bail, and the court is satisfied that there are substantial grounds for believing that, if released on bail (with or without conditions), the defendant would fail to surrender to custody, would commit an offence, or would interfere with witnesses or otherwise obstruct the course of justice.

Exceptions (a) and (d) do not apply where—

(a)

the defendant is 18 or over;

(b)

the defendant has not been convicted of an offence in those proceedings; and

(c)

it appears to the court that there is no real prospect that the defendant will be sentenced to a custodial sentence in those proceedings.

Under Part II of Schedule 1 to the 1976 Act, where the offence is not punishable with imprisonment—

(a)

the defendant need not be granted bail if it appears to the court that having previously been granted bail in criminal proceedings, the defendant has failed to surrender as required and, in view of that failure, the court believes that, if released on bail (with or without conditions), the defendant would fail to surrender to custody;

(b)

the defendant need not be granted bail if the court is satisfied that the defendant should be kept in custody for his or her own protection or welfare;

(c)

the defendant need not be granted bail if in custody pursuant to a sentence;

(d)

(e)

the defendant need not be granted bail if, having been released on bail in the case on a previous occasion, the defendant since has been arrested for breach of bail, and the court is satisfied that there are substantial grounds for believing that, if released on bail (with or without conditions), the defendant would commit an offence while on bail by engaging in conduct that would, or would be likely to, cause physical or mental injury to an associated person (within the meaning of section 33 of the Family Law Act 1996), or to cause that person to fear such injury.

Exceptions (a) and (d) apply only where—

(a)

the defendant is under 18; and

(b)

the defendant has been convicted in those proceedings.

Further exceptions to the general right to bail are set out in section 25 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994361, under which a defendant charged with murder, attempted murder, manslaughter, rape or another sexual offence specified in that section, and who has been previously convicted of such an offence, may be granted bail only if there are exceptional circumstances which justify it.

Requirements that may be monitored and enforced in another European Union member State

Under Article 8(1) of EU Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA of 23^rd October, 2009, on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention, the following are the requirements that may be monitored and enforced in a European Union member State (‘the monitoring State’) other than the state in which they were imposed as a condition of bail—

(a)

an obligation for the person to inform the competent authority in the monitoring State of any change of residence, in particular for the purpose of receiving a summons to attend a hearing or a trial in the course of criminal proceedings;

(b)

an obligation not to enter certain localities, places or defined areas in the issuing or monitoring State;

(c)

an obligation to remain at a specified place, where applicable during specified times;

(d)

an obligation containing limitations on leaving the territory of the monitoring State;

(e)

an obligation to report at specified times to a specific authority;

(f)

an obligation to avoid contact with specific persons in relation to the offence or offences allegedly committed.

Under Article 8(2) of the Framework Decision, other measures that a monitoring State may be prepared to monitor may include—

(a)

an obligation not to engage in specified activities in relation to the offence or offences allegedly committed, which may include involvement in a specified profession or field of employment;

(b)

an obligation not to drive a vehicle;

(c)

an obligation to deposit a certain sum of money or to give another type of guarantee, which may either be provided through a specified number of instalments or entirely at once;

(d)

an obligation to undergo therapeutic treatment or treatment for addiction; or

(e)

an obligation to avoid contact with specific objects in relation to the offence or offences allegedly committed.

Grounds for refusing to monitor and enforce a supervision measure imposed in another European Union member State

Under Schedule 6 to the Criminal Justice and Data Protection (Protocol No. 36) Regulations 2014362, the grounds for refusal are—

(a)

the certificate requesting monitoring under the Framework Decision—

(i)

is incomplete or obviously does not correspond to the decision on supervision measures, and

(ii)

is not completed or corrected within a period specified by the court;

(b)

where the defendant subject to the decision on supervision measures is lawfully and ordinarily resident in England and Wales, the defendant has not consented to return there with a view to the supervision measures being monitored there under the Framework Decision;

(c)

where the defendant subject to the decision on supervision measures is not lawfully and ordinarily resident in England and Wales, the defendant—

(i)

has not asked for a request to be made for monitoring of the supervision measures under the Framework Decision by a competent authority in in England and Wales, or

(ii)

has asked for such a request to be made but has not given adequate reasons as to why it should be made;

(d)

the certificate includes measures other than those referred to in Article 8 of the Framework Decision (see the list above);

(e)

recognition of the decision on supervision measures would contravene the principle of ne bis in idem;

(f)

the decision on supervision measures was based on conduct that would not constitute an offence under the law of England and Wales if it occurred there (with the exception of some specified categories of offence);

(g)

the decision was based on conduct where, under the law of England and Wales—

(i)

the criminal prosecution of the conduct would be statute-barred, and

(ii)

the conduct falls within the jurisdiction of England and Wales;

(h)

the decision on supervision measures was based on conduct by a defendant who was under the age of 10 when the conduct took place;

(i)

the conduct on which the decision on supervision measures was based is such that—

(i)

if there was a breach of the supervision measures, and

(ii)

a warrant was issued by the issuing State for the arrest of the defendant subject to the decision

the defendant would have to be discharged at an extradition hearing under the Extradition Act 2003;

(j)

it appears that the decision on supervision measures was in fact made for the purpose of punishing the defendant on account of the defendant’s race, ethnic origin, religion, nationality, language, gender, sexual orientation or political opinions.