Legislation – Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008
Changes to legislation:
Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008, Section 66 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 03 November 2025. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations.
Changes to Legislation
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. Changes and effects are recorded by our editorial team in lists which can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area. Where those effects have yet to be applied to the text of the legislation by the editorial team they are also listed alongside the legislation in the affected provisions. Use the ‘more’ link to open the changes and effects relevant to the provision you are viewing.
Changes and effects yet to be applied to Section 66:
- Sch. 7 para. 5A and cross-heading inserted by 2008 c. 25 Sch. 1 para. 90(3)
Changes and effects yet to be applied to the whole Act associated Parts and Chapters:
Whole provisions yet to be inserted into this Act (including any effects on those provisions):
- Sch. 7 para. 5A and cross-heading inserted by 2008 c. 25 Sch. 1 para. 90(3)
Part 5Criminal law
Pornography etc.
66Defence: participation in consensual acts
F1A1
Subsection (A2) applies where in England and Wales—
(a)
a person (“D”) is charged with an offence under section 63, and
(b)
the offence relates to an image that portrays an act or acts within subsection (7)(a) to (c) or (7A) of that section (but does not portray an act within subsection (7)(d) of that section).
A2
It is a defence for D to prove—
(a)
that D directly participated in the act or any of the acts portrayed, and
(b)
that the act or acts did not involve the infliction of any non-consensual harm on any person, and
(c)
if the image portrays an act within section 63(7)(c), that what is portrayed as a human corpse was not in fact a corpse, and
(d)
if the image portrays an act within section 63(7A), that what is portrayed as non-consensual penetration was in fact consensual.
(1)
(a)
a person (“D”) is charged with an offence under section 63, and
(b)
the offence relates to an image that portrays an act or acts F4within subsection (7)(a) to (c) or (7A) of that section (but does not portray an act within subsection (7)(d) of that section).
(2)
It is a defence for D to prove—
(a)
that D directly participated in the act or any of the acts portrayed, and
(b)
that the act or acts did not involve the infliction of any non-consensual harm on any person, and
(c)
if the image portrays an act within section 63(7)(c), that what is portrayed as a human corpse was not in fact a corpseF5; and
(d)
if the image portrays an act within section 63(7A), that what is portrayed as non-consensual penetration was in fact consensual.
(3)
For the purposes of this section harm inflicted on a person is “non-consensual” harm if—
(a)
the harm is of such a nature that the person cannot, in law, consent to it being inflicted on himself or herself; or
(b)
where the person can, in law, consent to it being so inflicted, the person does not in fact consent to it being so inflicted.