Hanna Grzelczak v General Dental Council [2026] EWHC 890 (Admin)
- Summary
- Citing
- Cited By
The High Court allowed Ms Hanna Grzelczak’s appeal against the GDC tribunal’s sanction of erasure and substituted a 6-month suspension, subject to a review hearing.
Ms Grzelczak, a dentist qualified in Poland and later registered in the UK, had admitted sending four emails in 2023 containing racially motivated comments about “Indian” dentistry and Damira Dental Studios. The tribunal had found misconduct, impairment, and imposed erasure with immediate suspension.
The court held that, although the misconduct was serious and represented a serious departure from professional standards, erasure was excessive and disproportionate. In particular, the judge found:
the conduct was repeated, but only across four emails over about four weeks;
Ms Grzelczak’s insight was limited, but not so persistently lacking as to justify erasure;
There was some evidence of remediation, including admissions, reflective work, CPD, and completion of the PASS scheme;
The tribunal had not adequately explained its finding of shortcomings in remediation;
The risk of repetition was reduced by the passage of time, her remediation efforts, and the deterrent effect of suspension;
The tribunal had identified only a general risk of harm, not serious harm or a continuing risk of serious harm of the level contemplated for erasure.
The judge emphasised that the purpose of fitness to practise proceedings is public protection, not punishment, and that under section 29 of the Dentists Act 1984 the court was conducting a rehearing rather than a narrow review.
The substituted sanction was a 6-month suspension from the date of the appeal decision, with a review hearing at the end. At that review, Ms Grzelczak is expected to provide further CPD, reflective learning, and an updated reflection statement addressing discrimination, respectful communication, professional behaviour, insight, impact on public confidence, and how repetition will be avoided.
Sastry & Okpara v General Medical Council [2021] EWCA Civ 623, [2021] 1 WLR 5029
Bawa-Garba v General Medical Council [2018] EWCA CIV 1879, [2019] 1 WLR 1929, [2019] 1 All ER 500
General Medical Council v Jagjivan [2017] EWHC 1247 (Admin), [2017] 1 WLR 4438
Khan v General Pharmaceutical Council [2017] 1 WLR 169, [2016] UKSC 64, [2017] 3 All ER 873
Council for the Regulation of Healthcare Professionals v General Medical Council and Southall [2005] EWHC 579 (Admin)
Ghosh v General Medical Council [2001] 1 WLR 1915, [2001] UKPC29
The General Medical Council v James Gilbert & Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 53
The General Medical Council v Professor Sir Roy Meadow [2006] EWCA Civ 1390
Lambert-Simpson v Health and Care Professions Council [2023] EWHC 481 (Admin)
Meadow v General Medical Council [2006] EWCA Civ 1390, [2007] QB 462, [2007] 2 WLR 286, [2007] 1 All ER 1