Dr Thomas Plimmer v General Medical Council [2024] EWHC 3343 (Admin)

Dr. Thomas Plimmer is a general practitioner whose name was erased from the medical register by a Medical Practitioners Tribunal due to misconduct and impaired fitness to practice. The misconduct included non-consensual sexual contact, sending unsolicited sexual images, and engaging in sexual acts at work. Dr. Plimmer challenged the Tribunal’s findings on three allegations and the determination on impairment and sanction.



Tribunal’s Findings: The Tribunal found Dr. Plimmer guilty of serious misconduct, including non-consensual sexual acts and sending unsolicited sexual content. It also found his fitness to practice impaired due to adverse mental health, including Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder (CSBD).

Grounds of Appeal: Dr. Plimmer appealed on several grounds, arguing that the Tribunal’s findings on specific allegations were wrong and that the determination on impairment and sanction was flawed.

Court’s Analysis: The court upheld the Tribunal’s findings, emphasising the consistency of witness testimony and the credibility issues with Dr. Plimmer’s account. It found no procedural unfairness in the Tribunal’s approach.

Impairment and Sanction: The court agreed with the Tribunal’s decision that Dr. Plimmer’s misconduct was serious and incompatible with continued registration. It noted the pattern of misconduct over three years and the risk of relapse due to his health condition.

Conclusion: The appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal’s decision to erase Dr. Plimmer’s name from the medical register was upheld, as it was necessary to maintain public confidence in the medical profession and uphold professional standards.

Ghosh v General Medical Council [2001] 1 WLR 1915, [2001] UKPC29
Fish v General Medical Council [2012] EWHC 1269 (Admin), [2012] Med LR 512 
Azzam v GMC [2008] EWHC 2711
R (Harry) v GMC [2006] EWHC 2050
Siddiqui v General Medical Council [2015] EWHC 1996 (Admin) 
Subesh v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 56
Gosalakkal v. General Medical Council [2015] EWHC 2445
Sastry v General Medical [2021] EWHCA Civ 623
Fatnani & Raschid v General Medical Council [2007] EWCA Civ 46, [2007] 1 WLR 1460
Assicurazioni Generali SpA v Arab Insurance Group [2003] 1 WLR 577
Southall v General Medical Council [2010] EWCA Civ 407
Byrne v General Medical Council [2021] EWHC 2237 (Admin)

R (Dutta) v General Medical Council (GMC) [2020] EWHC 1974 (Admin)
Gupta v General Medical Council [2002] 1 WLR 1691, [2001] UKPC 61
General Medical Council v Jagjivan [2017] EWHC 1247 (Admin), [2017] 1 WLR 4438
Datec Electronics Holdings Ltd v United Parcels Service Ltd [2007] 1 WLR 1325
Khan v General Pharmaceutical Council [2017] 1 WLR 169, [2016] UKSC 64, [2017] 3 All ER 873
Council for the Regulation of Healthcare Professionals v General Medical Council and Southall [2005] EWHC 579 (Admin)
Farquharson v Bar Standards Board [2022] EWHC 1128 (Admin)
The Law Society v Salsbury [2008] EWCA Civ 1285, [2009] 1 WLR 1286
Fuglers LLP v Solicitors Regulation Authority [2014] EWHC 179 (Admin)
Dr Collen Nkomo v The General Medical Council [2019] EWHC 2625 (Admin)
Yeong v General Medical Council [2009] EWHC 1923 (Admin)
Absolute Living Developments v DS7 Ltd & Ors [2018] EWHC 171 (Ch)

Bolton v The Law Society [1994] 1 WLR 512
GMC v Stone [2017] 4 WLR 207, [2017] WLR(D) 681, [2017] EWHC 2534 (Admin)
General Medical Council v Chandra [2018] EWCA Civ 1898, [2019] 1 WLR 1140
General Medical Council v Bawa-Garba [2018] EWHC 76 (Admin), [2018] 4 WLR 44
Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence v (1) Nursing and Midwifery Council, (2) Grant [2011] EWHC 927 (Admin), [2011] ACD 72
Cheatle v General Medical Council [2009] EWHC 645 (Admin)
Beckwith v Solicitors Regulation Authority [2020] EWHC 3231 (Admin)
Crabbie v GMC [2002] 1 WLR 310
Sreenath v GMC [2002] UKPC 56
Yassin v the General Medical Council [2015] EWHC 2955 (Admin)